Sunday, February 8, 2015

on sacrifices

I was sitting in my rocking chair, a sweet little newborn to my chest. He was dozing off and I was perusing the internet via phone. I came across an article - I can't find it now - that struck a chord with me. The gist of it was this: A woman shouldn't have to sacrifice her career to have a baby. The author noted the plight of the American woman in the workplace, including high cost of child care, inadequate maternity leave, and the tendency of women to hold back from promotions or other job opportunities because of family life.

Let me be clear on one thing before I begin: I absolutely believe that women and men should be treated fairly in the workplace. I believe in equal pay for equal work/experience and that people shouldn't be discriminated against simply because of their gender.  Also, I realize single mothers don't have an option of staying home and the cost of child care and other struggles can be especially debilitating in these situations. Just wanted to get that out of the way.

But let's get one thing straight:

Having a family requires sacrifices.

It just does. When you choose to bring a child into this world, you are choosing to sacrifice. For 9 months a woman gives up her body to house another living soul. After birth, a mother sacrifices sleep and time to keep this little thing nourished.  Every step of the way, we give things up. Late nights with friends are traded in for early bedtime. Fancy dinner dates are traded in for happy meals. Instead of buying new shoes for ourselves we are paying for piano lessons. The list goes on. And yes, our careers take a hit as well. Some of us choose to stay home instead of capitalizing on these prime career years. Some choose to work, but are passed up for promotions because of the time commitment. We all make sacrifices.

(Fathers make sacrifices too. A lot of dads pass up promotions so they don't have to move their families, or choose a career based on whether they can live close to grandparents. They, too, leave work early to attend concerts and basketball games. If a woman feels slighted because the bulk of the child-care responsibilities is falling on her shoulders, perhaps she should look no further than her husband, and figure out a solution that works for both of them.)

Anything worth having is worth sacrificing for. We give up time and money for an education. We go without stuff we want now for things we want in the future - like saving for a new car or a down payment on a house.

And nothing - no career aspirations or fancy cars or prestige - even comes close to this:


This is joy. Real, true, lasting joy. The kind of joy that is seeded in sacrifice and vulnerability and, above all, love and connection. To be a part of something bigger than yourself.

It is worth the sacrifice.

5 comments:

Crystal said...

Thank you. Thank you! You describe my feelings perfectly with much more tact. The article you read reminded me a lot of Pres Obama's speech a few weeks (months?) ago about women and the workplace. While I agree, women should have the same opportunities as men, I also believe women who sacrifice those opportunities for family will find greater happiness and fulfillment. Anyway, thank you for voicing my voice :)

Kerstin said...

I disagree with you. And I also agree with you.
I agree that having children means sacrifices (which I hope myself will be so much worth it). And I agree with your very eloquent sentence "she should look no further than her busband", because that might often be correct.

But I disagree with this sentence, too, because I think that women have to make sacrifices because of their gender. Because it's statistically the women who stay at home with the kids (in the beginning) or work part time, I believe that any woman might be discriminated. After I have finished law school and started to look for a job, compatibility between this job and kids was often mentioned in interviews (without me saying anything). I have male lawyer friends and they didn't experience that. I work together with a female colleague who is also in her thirties and also newly married. Someone said to both of us: "Oh your poor boss, when both of you start having kids. This would have not been said to a male colleague.

I don't know the article you mention, but I still believe with all my heart that employers should enable all parents to combine work and kids. Not only makes it employees happier and therefore more motivated. It also helps parents to decide becoming parents because they know they don't have to sacrifice (too much).

Kerstin said...

Obviously again a thought provoking post. :-) I love them and think you write very well (even though I don't agree with everything)!

Erin L said...

Kerstin, I appreciate your thoughts. I have actually spent quite a bit thinking about them. My question is this: Why is it wrong for an employer to ask if parenthood might affect your ability to do a job. If I was looking to hire someone and I had reason to suspect that they might potentially leave for one reason or another in the next few years, isn't it my right as an employer to ask about it? If you have no plans to have children in the near future, then that question is easy to answer. If you are, does the employer have the right to know that? Maybe, maybe not. However, the number of women who enter the workforce has grown exponentially in the last few decades. And truthfully, what is wrong with saying "your poor boss when you start having kids." It simply assumes that you will make your new addition a priority. Is that a wrong assumption? I think mothers naturally want to spend time with their children. It is in our DNA. And they are also saying that you are a valuable asset to the company. Sounds to me like a compliment! But I can understand how women are treated differently than a male colleague in these situations. Most men are not asked how their family will affect their job.

Kerstin said...

I think it's your latter sentence that makes it wrong for an employer to ask that if parenthood might affect your ability to do a job. The question isn't about "parenthood", it's about "motherhood". To be honest, even though I want to keep on working if I have kids, I probably want to work part-time (I hope my employer won't read this :-)). But I don't believe that this is because I am a woman, I think it's because I am myself. But still, this doesn't mean it's the same for every woman and so I believe that the question shouldn't be asked because it's an assumption and generalisation.

As for the legal Situation: In Germany, employers aren't allowed to ask in job interviews whether you are pregnant or plan to be pregnant. If you had to affirm, you would even be allowed to lie without any consequences. The reason is that pregnancy doesn't neccessarily affect your ability to work in the long run. Yes, it isn't the best option for the employer, but it is for the employee. Do you think I would have had any chance to start working, if I had been honest and said: "Ok, my plan is to work for two years and then I'm going to try to be pregnant as soon as possible. Afterwards, I will only work part-time"? Even though I didn't even know if (ever) and when I will be pregnant. Sometimes different interests have to be balanced and in this case it's an "unfair" result to the employer.

As for the sacrifice - I just don't like the general assumption (not yours) that motherhood needs to result in (different) sacrifices than fatherhood.